The Origins and Evolutionary Status of B Stars Found Far From The Galactic Plane
by
John C. Martin
Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy
At the Case Western Reserve Univesity, Warner & Swasey Observatory
On April 24th, 2003
Dissertation Adviser: Dr. R. Earle Luck
Associated Papers
- "The Origins and Evolutionary Status of B Stars Found Far From the Galactic Plane II: Stellar Kinematics and Final Analysis"
- "The Origins and Evolutionary Status of B Stars Found Far From the Galactic Plane I: Composition and Spectral Features"
- "The Masses Of The B-Stars In The High Galactic Latitude Eclipsing Binary IT Lib"
Executive Summary
Be aware that this material has passed muster with a
dissertation defenses committee but it has not yet been christened in
the fire of a full peer review journal.
Since the discovery of faint blue stars at high galactic latitudes,
which spectroscopically appear to be similar to Population I B stars,
a debate has raged about their origin and characteristics. Their
faint apparent magnitudes have been interpreted to place many of them
several kiloparsecs above the galactic plane in the halo. Some have
been thought to be too far from the galactic plane and moving too
slowly to be young B stars which were ejected from the star forming
regions of the disk. A sample of these stars, taken from the
Hipparcos catalog, was observed at high spectroscopic dispersion
(R=60000), analyzed for chemical composition, traced back in time
along their trajectory in the galactic potential using their full
computed space velocities (determined from radial velocity and proper
motions), and investigated for other oddities including infrared flux
excesses.
The results and conclusions drawn from this comprehensive survey
include:
- There are no massive Pop I stars in this sample that could have
formed in situ in the galactic halo. Additionally there is no need to
invoke this scenario as an explanation for B stars found far from the
galactic plane since massive Population I runaway stars, BHB stars,
and PAGB stars are able to account for all high galactic latitude B
stars.
- There is remarkable consensus between this study and others that
about 30% of the apparently “normal” B stars found far from the
galactic plane are old low mass evolved stars. The remaining fraction
(70%) are high mass Population I B stars which have been ejected from
the disk.
- Combined, relative abundance analysis and analysis of full space
velocities in a galactic potential model are very effective tools for
determining the natures and origins of high galactic latitude B
stars.
- Infrared excesses, which are normally associated with older
evolved stars, are a relatively reliable way to quickly identify the
most likely low mass evolved star candidates. The final release of
the 2MASS data makes this tool more widely available for B stars with
V magnitudes as faint as 13 or 14. Down the road, the data from SIRTF
might be mined for this purpose as well.
- A majority of high galactic B stars with vsin(i) less than 50 km/s
are older evolved stars. In fact, the proportion of stars with small
projected rotational velocities is significantly smaller among runaway
Pop I B Stars than for B stars in the field of the galactic disk. The
reason for this is uncertain. The most likely explanation is that the
ejection mechanism(s) which produce runaways somehow discriminate
against slowly rotating B stars.
- Even though conventional wisdom dictates that all evolved stars
should be slow rotators, there are PAGB stars which rotate much more
rapidly than horizontal branch stars. Since almost nothing is known
about the rotational properties of PAGB stars a survey is need to
determine how many and what types of PAGB stars are rapid rotators.
Better understanding of PAGB star rotation could lead to better
understanding of the late stages of stellar evolution and the
formation of planetary nebula.
- Since most runaways are observed near the apex of their trajectory
and the distance of that point from the galactic plane correlates with
ejection velocity, the volume occupied by a sample of runaway B stars
has a strong influence on the distribution of ejection velocities
observed in that sample . Future work with the aim of examining the
distribution of ejection velocities for runaway stars should be
designed to avoid the inherent biases that are present in a sample
limited by volume.
- Runaway B stars ejected from the disk cannot presently be used to
constrain the galactic potential in any meaningful way. There is too
much uncertainty in the main sequence lifetimes and only the flight
times of the stars closest to the galactic plane are sensitive to
changes in the potential.
The Dissertation
This dissertation is being made available by the author (who holds
non-exclusive rights to this document) to anyone who wishes to use it
for educational or research purposes as long as proper citations and footnotes
are made crediting the author. This
document may not be reproduced or distributed for profit under penalty
of US copyright law. Some portions of this document will remain embargoed
until the results are published in a peer reviewed journal. If you feel
the author should kick his butt into gear and get those publications written
faster, feel free to harrass him.
Copies of this dissertation can be found in the collections of the Case
Western Reserve University Library (Cleveland, OH), the Libary of the United States Naval
Observatory (Washington, DC), and the UMI Dissertation
Archives.
I strongly suggest that you use the papers above as reference for scientific material and conclusions since they have been through peer review. I am providing PDFs of the chapters themselves only for the suplementary material and explaination which some people may find useful.
Contents:
Errata!
This is a lsit of known errata in my disseration. They have not
been corrected in the PDF files above or the archived copies.
- The oscillator strengths listed in the tables of atomic data in
Chapter 5 are give as the natural log (base e) rather than the
base 10 logarithm. This was corrected in the paper published for
that data in the AJ.
Citing this Work
This represents a lot of hard work on my part. If you use my dissertation itself, please cite it. I'd suggest:
Martin, J.C. 2003, PhD Thesis, Case Western Reserve University
Or in LaTeX:
\bibitem[Martin(2003)]{2003PhDT.........4M} Martin, J.~C.\ 2003,
Ph.D.~Thesis, Case Western Reserve University
Or you can cite one of the resulting peer-review publications
Last Updated 9 March 2006